ArticleInternational endodontic journal2025
In situ imaging and microbiome analysis of calculus-like deposits at the root apex: A case report of refractory apical periodontitis.
Article in International endodontic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In situ imaging and microbiome analysis of calculus-like deposits at the root apex: A case report of refractory apical periodontitis.International endodontic journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThis case report explored the application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to visualize and characterize microbial populations in a refractory endodontic infection with apical calculus-like deposits, a rarely reported phenomenon. SUMMARY: Histopathologic analysis revealed bacterial biofilms and calcifications on the root surface, with Gram-positive bacteria predominant in both hard and soft tissues. Microbial sequencing showed Pseudomonadota dominated hard tissues, whereas Bacillota were prevalent in soft tissues, with distinct genera like Lactibacterium and Streptococcus identified. FISH imaging confirmed spatially distributed bacterial taxa, including Actinomycetota and Chloroflexota, within the biofilm, aligning with NGS findings. Notably, Bacteroidota was exclusive to soft tissues, whereas Chloroflexota was detected only in hard tissues. The presence of extensive calculus-like deposits on the root surface provided new insights into the microbial complexity of persistent endodontic infections and their management. KEY LEARNING POINTS: The combination of NGS and FISH provided unprecedented insights into the microbial composition of refractory endodontic infections, revealing a diverse and spatially organized ecosystem. Distinct microbial compositions in hard and soft tissues emphasize the importance of targeted therapeutic strategies for endodontic infections. The presence of unique bacterial taxa and biofilms in calculus-like deposits offers new avenues for research into the pathogenesis and persistence of endodontic infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.