ArticleNeurourology and urodynamics2025
Envisioning the Future of AI in Urodynamics: Exploratory Interviews With Experts.
Article in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUrodynamics monitors various parameters while the urinary bladder fills and empties, to diagnose functional or anatomic disorders of the lower urinary tract. It is an invasive and complex test with technical challenges, and it needs rigorous quality assessment and training of clinicians to avoid misdiagnosis. Applying AI to urodynamic pattern recognition and noisy data signals seems promising.
aimTo understand desirable and appropriate applications, this study aims to explore the envisioned future of AI in urodynamics according to experts in AI and/or urodynamics.
methodTen semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore expectations, trust and possibilities of AI in urodynamics. Content analysis with an inductive approach was performed on all data.
resultsThe analysis resulted in seven overarching themes: difficulties with urodynamics, quality of urodynamics, AI will be supportive, development and training of AI systems, desirable outcomes, challenges, and envisioning the future of AI in urodynamics. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionIn the vision of experts, urodynamics practices will change with the introduction of AI. In the beginning, clinicians will probably desire to check AI-made outcomes of UDS tests to gain trust the system. After experiencing the value of these systems, clinicians might let the system independently provide suggested UDS analyses, and they will use more of their time to spend on their patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.