ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2025
Supporting the Needs of Urban, Head Start Parents to Engage in Group Preventative Parent Training Programs (PPTPs).
Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Group preventative parent training programs (PPTPs) have been used successfully to improve outcomes for families living in poverty in settings such as Head Start. Nevertheless, such programs face significant enrollment and engagement challenges. Given that research on factors related to parent preferences for group PPTP participation is limited, the purpose of the current study is to examine what types of programs are most preferred by a combined sample of English and Spanish speaking Head Start parents, and to translate program modeling of parent preferences into feasible programming options. The current study relies on conjoint analysis, a technique derived from market research, to learn more about how Head Start parents leverage attributes of a parenting program when making hypothetical participation decisions. Based on a discrete choice experiment with 234 urban, Early Head Start and Head Start parents, findings indicate that parents prioritize program attributes that target strong improvements for their children on desired outcomes, such as academics and friendship skills, while also offering incentives for participation. Simulations indicated that 77.6% of parents preferred an Optimizing Outcomes Program, while 22.4% preferred a Foundational Needs Program. Finally, results indicate that child prosocial or difficult behavior and parent depression risk are associated with specific program preferences. Parents with fewer resources prefer programs that are more foundational and realistic to target more modest gains. Implications are discussed in terms of program modeling and offering programs tailored to preferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40518503What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.