ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2025
Numerical study of the structural design influence on cartilage cell differentiation in mechanically stimulated hydrogel scaffolds using an FSI-based model.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting Cell Differentiation in Mechanically Stimulated Biphasic Osteochondral Scaffolds Using Fluid-Structure Interaction Modelling.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Role of external forces in the mechanobiology of stem and differentiated chondrogenic cells embedded in a tissue-engineered construct for cartilage repair.Journal of biomedical science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) hydrogel scaffolds show considerable promise for the regenerative treatment of cartilage and bone defects. Within tissue engineering, these scaffolds can be mechanically stimulated to specifically promote cartilage formation. While in vitro experiments are traditionally used to study the influence of scaffold structure on cell differentiation, in silico studies offer a complementary, cost-effective, and powerful approach. This numerical study employs a transient fluid-structure interaction (FSI) model to modify the structural design of a mechanically stimulated hydrogel scaffold for enhanced cartilage cell differentiation. The study involved two key modification steps applied to scaffolds under 5% compression. In the first step, scaffold porosity was adjusted by altering the number of strands per layer. The scaffold designed with 38% porosity, consisting of 9 strands per layer across 9 layers, improved cartilage differentiation by approximately 15%. The second step focused on scaling the selected scaffold from step 1 by adjusting the number of layers while keeping the porosity constant, aiming to optimize pore dimensions. This led to a slight improvement in cartilage differentiation of about 2.3%. The results indicate that porosity exerts a more significant influence on cell differentiation than pore size in the structured scaffolds investigated. The FSI-based model demonstrates strong potential for analyzing the impact of pore architecture on cell differentiation, although manufacturing challenges of hydrogel scaffolds may limit the practical application of these modification strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.