Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40518480›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2025

Numerical study of the structural design influence on cartilage cell differentiation in mechanically stimulated hydrogel scaffolds using an FSI-based model.

Pedram Azizi, Christoph Drobek, Hermann Seitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pedram AziziChair of Microfluidics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Marine Technology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany. pedram.azizi@uni-rostock.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3671-271X
Christoph DrobekChair of Microfluidics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Marine Technology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Hermann SeitzChair of Microfluidics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Marine Technology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3401-0090

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 1270/1;2 - 299150580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) hydrogel scaffolds show considerable promise for the regenerative treatment of cartilage and bone defects. Within tissue engineering, these scaffolds can be mechanically stimulated to specifically promote cartilage formation. While in vitro experiments are traditionally used to study the influence of scaffold structure on cell differentiation, in silico studies offer a complementary, cost-effective, and powerful approach. This numerical study employs a transient fluid-structure interaction (FSI) model to modify the structural design of a mechanically stimulated hydrogel scaffold for enhanced cartilage cell differentiation. The study involved two key modification steps applied to scaffolds under 5% compression. In the first step, scaffold porosity was adjusted by altering the number of strands per layer. The scaffold designed with 38% porosity, consisting of 9 strands per layer across 9 layers, improved cartilage differentiation by approximately 15%. The second step focused on scaling the selected scaffold from step 1 by adjusting the number of layers while keeping the porosity constant, aiming to optimize pore dimensions. This led to a slight improvement in cartilage differentiation of about 2.3%. The results indicate that porosity exerts a more significant influence on cell differentiation than pore size in the structured scaffolds investigated. The FSI-based model demonstrates strong potential for analyzing the impact of pore architecture on cell differentiation, although manufacturing challenges of hydrogel scaffolds may limit the practical application of these modification strategies.

Indexed as

CartilageCell DifferentiationHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateHydrogelsModels, BiologicalNumerical Analysis, Computer-AssistedTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsChondrocytesPorosityStress, MechanicalTissue EngineeringHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateHydrogelsCell differentiationComputational fluid dynamicFinite element analysisFluid–structure interactionIn silicoTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID40518480
PMCPMC12246015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.