ArticleNeurology and therapy2025
Development and Validation of PARCOMS Composite Scales for Assessing Disease Progression and Treatment Effects in Parkinson's Disease.
Article in Neurology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMeasures designed to comprehensively assess Parkinson's disease (PD) irrespective of disease stage and treatment status may be unable to capture nuances in disease progression, particularly in early-stage PD. The objective of this paper is to develop PARkinson's COMposite Scales (PARCOMS) with increased responsiveness to clinical decline using items of the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) for three discrete cohorts of patients.
methodsPatients with confirmed PD from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) data were assigned to three cohorts based on use of dopaminergic treatment, stage of disease, and presence of motor complication. For each cohort, items from MDS-UPDRS Part I (PARCOMS-Non-Motor) and Parts II and III (PARCOMS-Motor) were selected based on responsiveness using partial least squares (PLS) regression. The responsiveness of the scales was estimated using mean-to-standard deviation ratios (MSDRs) of their change values.
resultsCompared to the original MDS-UPDRS, MSDRs for PARCOMS-Motor increased 13.1% (untreated cohort, n = 430), 78.2% (treated-without-motor-complications cohort, n = 426), and 100.6% (treated-with-motor-complications cohort, n = 538). The MSDR increases observed for PARCOMS-Non-Motor were 13.9%, 6.8%, and 20.7%, respectively. Across cohorts, turning in bed and speech items were large contributors to the PARCOMS-Motor scales. Items for cognitive impairment and urinary problems were substantial contributors to PARCOMS-Non-Motor across cohorts. There was variability in the weighting of items representing different clinical concepts across cohorts for each composite, confirming heterogeneity in disease progression across disease stages.
conclusionsPD stage-specific composite measures were developed and demonstrated greater sensitivity to change than the original MDS-UPDRS, supporting the value of weighted composites tailored for disease stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.