ReviewSeminars in perinatology2025
An end to genetic exceptionalism: reframing the ethics of genomic sequencing for rapid neonatal diagnosis.
Review in Seminars in perinatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exome or genome sequencing (ES/GS) is increasingly used as the first-line test for postnatal diagnosis of rare genetic conditions, especially in intensive care units (ICUs). Early concerns regarding the use of broad genetic testing centered on the potential for psychosocial harm, particularly related to unexpected or uncertain findings. As the usage of ES/GS has grown and evolved, the ethical concerns initially raised have not borne out in empirical measurement of patient and family experience. We therefore review the use of diagnostic genomic sequencing in the neonatal intensive care unit with comparison to other standard diagnostic tests that have not elicited similar ethical questioning. We frame this landscape within the concept of genetic contextualism rather than exceptionalism and suggest that this approach may lead to a more productive future for applied genomic medicine, especially for sick neonates and infants in the NICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.