ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Improving venous access by using a near-infrared vein-finder device and ultrasound skill building: a quality improvement project.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVenous access by venipuncture and cannulation is a crucial procedure in day-to-day patient care in clinical settings. Performing this procedure on difficult veins can be time-consuming and burdensome for healthcare providers and painful and uncomfortable for patients. This quality improvement project aimed to optimise venous access by using a near-infrared (NIR) vein-finder device and provide ultrasound practical skills training to facilitate venous access.
methodsThe first plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycle introduced an NIR device to hospital wards after collecting baseline data on success rate, number of attempts, procedure duration and need for help or escalation. These data were submitted by ward staff voluntarily for any venipuncture or cannulation procedure, followed by data analyses and plans for a second cycle. The second PDSA cycle involved organising a practical training session for the use of an ultrasound device for venous access. Participants voluntarily used their newly acquired ultrasound skills for difficult veins after multiple failed attempts without a device and submitted a Google form with questions about the above-mentioned success indicators.
resultsIn the first cycle, improvements were observed in all chosen quality indicators but were only statistically significant for the overall success rate (venipuncture and cannulations combined), the overall number of attempts and the overall duration of venous access procedures as well as for number of attempts and procedure duration for venipuncture individually. For the second PDSA cycle, after attending the ultrasound training session, participants reported an 80.95% overall success rate of venous access for difficult veins that were inaccessible before the ultrasound device was used. It also significantly reduced the number of attempts needed to get venous access when compared with attempts before using the ultrasound device.
conclusionsBased on our findings, we recommend providing an NIR vein-finder device and ultrasound training to improve venous access in hospital settings and encourage further research to evaluate their effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.