ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Collaboration in nursing-home care: perspectives of care professionals - a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interprofessional collaboration became more firmly positioned after the WHO highlighted its importance for better healthcare outcomes. In nursing homes, interprofessional collaboration refers to collaboration between teams of physicians/allied health professionals and care teams. Collaboration within care teams is known as intraprofessional collaboration. Determinants of interprofessional and intraprofessional collaboration have yet to be explored within the nursing-home context. Our exploratory qualitative study focused on the determinants considered important by professionals in seven nursing homes. We conducted 14 one-on-one, semistructured interviews with nurses and collaborating physicians/allied health professionals from seven teams of one care organisation. Data were analysed on thematic analysis, proceeding from an inductive approach. Five interacting determinants were identified. The core determinant was 'investing in each other', followed by 'roles, functions and responsibilities within care teams'; 'written policies for individual residents'; 'verbal coordination meetings'; and 'organisational influences'. One notable finding is the influence of intraprofessional collaboration within the care team on all determinants of interprofessional collaboration, including the role of the coordinating nurse. Future ethnographic and action research on intraprofessional collaboration is needed, including the perspective of nurse assistants, as well as on interventions aimed at improving interprofessional collaboration. We recommend training professionals to invest in each other as a skill that encourages relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.