Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40517441›Full record

ReviewHematological oncology2025

Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: What's Next?

Sang Eun Yoon, Won Seog Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematological oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sang Eun YoonDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0379-5297
Won Seog KimDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5400-0466

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a rare and heterogeneous group of diseases, with over 30 subtypes according to the International Consensus Classification of Mature Lymphoid Neoplasms (ICC) and World Health Organization Classification of Hematolymphoid Tumors (WHO-HEM) 2022. The classification complexity reflects the underlying genetic and biological diversity of PTCL. For decades, distinct PTCL subtypes have been uniformly treated with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) or CHOP-like regimens originally developed for mainly B-cell lymphoma. Attempts to improve frontline CHOP-plus strategies have failed mainly due to toxicities and lack of biological rationale. Only the ECHELON-2 trial succeeded as more than 70% of patients had anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), where brentuximab vedotin (BV) is most effective. Looking ahead to 2025 and beyond, future treatment strategies for PTCL should be guided by a deeper understanding of its underlying biology rather than relying on empirical extrapolations from other lymphomas.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsLymphoma, T-Cell, PeripheralCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinHumansPrednisoneVincristineCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinPrednisoneVincristinebrentuximab‐vedotinCHOPfollicular helper T‐cell lymphomaperipheral T‐cell lymphoma

Identifiers

PMID40517441
PMCPMC12167640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.