SynthesisBlood advances2025
Cortisol in sickle cell disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractCortisol plays a critical role in the biological link between psychosocial stress and health outcomes; however, the methods for assessing cortisol and the biopsychosocial correlates of this stress hormone among individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) are not well developed. This review aimed to systematically evaluate the current literature for cortisol measurement and methodology among individuals with SCD and synthesize findings of biopsychosocial correlates in this population. A systematic search of medical databases was conducted, resulting in 20 studies meeting inclusion criteria, involving 710 participants with SCD and 454 control participants without SCD. Cortisol was primarily measured using serum (k = 10) and plasma (k = 8), and few studies used salivary (k = 1) or hair (k = 1) measurements. Most studies investigated cortisol in comparison with a control group (k = 14). Qualitative findings were inconsistent, and quantitative meta-analytic data (k = 12) imply no significant difference in cortisol in SCD participants relative to healthy controls (serum Hedges g = -1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.99 to 0.97; plasma Hedges g = -0.72; 95% CI, -1.56 to 0.13). Additionally, studies examined cortisol in comparison with adrenal standards (k = 5), responses to adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation (k = 7), and correlations with vaso-occlusive crises (k = 3) and disease severity (k = 3). Few studies explored medication (k = 2) or behavioral correlates (k = 1) of cortisol. Finally, no study investigated the influence of psychosocial stressors on cortisol levels. There is a clear need for high-quality observational research to clarify cortisol findings in SCD and identify psychosocial correlates and biomedical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.