Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40517350›Full record

ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2025

Emerging frontiers in adoptive cell therapies: innovations, challenges, and future perspectives.

Anmol Dogra, Ranjeet Kumar Yadav, Himanshu Singh, Vimal Datt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. [Biomaterials of different sizes for enhanced adoptive cell transfer therapy in solid tumors].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anmol DograNoida Institute of Engineering and Technology (Pharmacy Institute), Greater Noida, U.P., 201306, India.
Ranjeet Kumar YadavNoida Institute of Engineering and Technology (Pharmacy Institute), Greater Noida, U.P., 201306, India.
Himanshu SinghNoida Institute of Engineering and Technology (Pharmacy Institute), Greater Noida, U.P., 201306, India. rajput.1998himanshusingh@gmail.com.
Vimal DattNoida Institute of Engineering and Technology (Pharmacy Institute), Greater Noida, U.P., 201306, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) is a ground-breaking development in cancer treatment that uses modified immune cells to target and eradicate tumors precisely. ACT is a type of immunotherapy in which T cells are genetically manipulated to produce chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and T cell receptors. CAR-T cell therapy, with its promising effects, has transformed the area of ACTs, notably for hematologic malignancies. ACT is not ideal, and it can cause significant side effects, limiting its use in clinical trials. One of the most promising approaches to reducing side effects is to give adoptive T cells the ability to target neoantigens, which are unique to tumor cells. In this review, we focused on the principles, benefits, challenges, and pre-clinical, translational, and clinical research on ACT, as well as safety concerns such as cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. We also discussed combination approaches, personalized approaches, and emerging technologies involved in maximizing ACT efficacy.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsAnimalsHumansReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAdoptive cell therapyCAR-T cellsClinical studiesEmerging technologiesTranslational researchTumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.