Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40517296›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthodontics2025

Adherence to clinical practice guidelines amongst adolescents with buccal fixed orthodontic appliances in northeast Netherlands: a cross-sectional study.

Sebastiaan P van Doornik, Scott Lietmeijer, Yijin Ren, David J Manton, Pieter U Dijkstra, Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sebastiaan P van DoornikDepartment of Orthodontics, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1144-3571
Scott LietmeijerCenter for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, FB 21, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0005-0223-7540
Yijin RenDepartment of Orthodontics, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2374-1771
David J MantonCenter for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, FB 21, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4570-0620
Pieter U DijkstraDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5487-1907
Anne Marie Kuijpers-JagtmanDepartment of Orthodontics, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8172-0090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescents undergoing orthodontic fixed appliance treatment face an increased risk of dental caries and developing white spot lesions (WSLs) due to challenges in maintaining effective oral hygiene. Preventive measures, including adherence to clinical guidelines, are important to reduce these risks.

objectiveTo analyse adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) amongst patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with buccal fixed appliances in the northeast of the Netherlands.

methodsA survey was presented to 539 adolescents aged 12-17 undergoing buccal fixed appliance treatment. Participants were recruited from ten orthodontic practices. The survey assessed adherence to the six recommendations of the Dutch CPGs. An adherence sum score (range 0 to 6) was calculated. Descriptive statistics and linear regression analyses (1000 bootstrap samples) were performed to analyse the relationships between participants' characteristics and adherence sum scores.

resultsIn total, 485 adolescents started the survey, of whom 393 (72.9%) could be included (57% female; 48.9% aged 13 or 14). The median adherence sum score was 5 (IQR 4, 5), and 22.6% (n = 89) had an adherence sum score of 6. Males had a lower adherence sum score than females (-0.442, 95% CI: -0.979, -0.234). Older participants had a lower adherence sum score than younger participants (-0.066, 95%CI: -0.136, 0.002) per year of age. Higher educated participants had a lower adherence sum score than participants with lower education (-0.534, 95%CI: -0.953, -0.096). LIMITATIONS: Self-reported data may introduce information bias as participants may give socially desirable answers.

conclusionsAdherence to the CPGs amongst adolescents with buccal fixed orthodontic appliances is suboptimal, particularly in boys and older adolescents. Tailored educational interventions may address these gaps.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceOrthodontic Appliances, FixedPractice Guidelines as TopicAdolescentAge FactorsChildCross-Sectional StudiesDental CariesEducational StatusFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsOral HygieneSex Factorsadherenceadolescent oral healthbuccal fixed appliancescaries preventionclinical practice guidelineorthodonticsorthodontic treatment

Identifiers

PMID40517296
PMCPMC12167228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.