Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40517243›Full record

SynthesisInternational breastfeeding journal2025

Explaining the experiences of donors, recipients, and healthcare providers regarding milk donation: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.

Zahra Mahdikhani, Shahideh Jahanian Sadatmahalleh, Zainab Alimoradi, Abbas Habibelahi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International breastfeeding journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Exploring human milk donation: A cross-sectional study.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zahra MahdikhaniDepartment of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Shahideh Jahanian SadatmahallehDepartment of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. shahideh.jahanian@modares.ac.ir.
Zainab AlimoradiSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Abbas HabibelahiShariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization recommends Donated Human Milk as the first option if maternal milk is unavailable. In this research, the researchers intend to obtain a set of in-depth information about the experiences of mothers and healthcare workers of human milk bank.

methodsA content analysis method was used to carry out this meta-synthesis. The modified PECO-S method was used to determine the inclusion criteria. A comprehensive search without a time limit for studies was performed using "milk bank" and related combined keywords. A combination of electronic and manual searches of several databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Embase, Web of Science, and ProQuest, was performed. First, the titles and abstracts were examined by two reviewers. Two researchers used the Joanna Briggs Institute tool to evaluate the quality of the studies. All findings of eligible studies were considered, and the open coding was used for data analysis. The codes were extracted from each article's text. Finally, the concepts were coded again to obtain the themes.

resultsRelevant qualitative studies were reviewed, and a total of 36 articles were subjected to meta-synthesis. The total number of participants included in the studies was 1,389, ranging in age 14-45 years. From the total of 134 extracted codes, 25 subcategories, eight categories, and four main themes were obtained: a) Donating milk, reviving two lives, b) Empathy and all-round support necessary to promote milk donation, c) Receiving donated milk: the paradox of choosing health or disease, and d) Development and facilitation of the infrastructure required to improve milk donation and receiving services.

conclusionsBased on the study results on the experience of milk donation, educational programs can be designed to encourage milk donation. Empathy and support for encouraging milk donation should be provided at the family, community, and healthcare system. Incorrect beliefs lead to hesitation in accepting donated milk. Health policymakers need to implement actions to correct these negative beliefs. The development and facilitation of milk bank infrastructure are essential for improving milk bank services. It is necessary to update the awareness of community and facilitate the use of milk bank services.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelMilk BanksMilk, HumanMothersTissue DonorsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansDonor milkDonor motherHealthcare providerMeta-synthesisMilk bankRecipient mothers

Identifiers

PMID40517243
PMCPMC12167580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.