Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40517231›Full record

ReviewEpigenetics & chromatin2025

Artificial Intelligence in cancer epigenomics: a review on advances in pan-cancer detection and precision medicine.

Karishma Sahoo, Prakash Lingasamy, Masuma Khatun, Sajitha Lulu Sudhakaran, Andres Salumets, Vino Sundararajan, Vijayachitra Modhukur

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karishma SahooIntegrative Multiomics Lab, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632014, Tamil Nadu, India.
Prakash LingasamyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, L. Puusepa 8, 50406, Tartu, Estonia.
Masuma KhatunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.
Sajitha Lulu SudhakaranIntegrative Multiomics Lab, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632014, Tamil Nadu, India.
Andres SalumetsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, L. Puusepa 8, 50406, Tartu, Estonia. andres.salumets@ki.se.
Vino SundararajanIntegrative Multiomics Lab, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632014, Tamil Nadu, India.
Vijayachitra ModhukurDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, L. Puusepa 8, 50406, Tartu, Estonia. vijayachitra.modhukur@ut.ee.

Funding

Estonian Research Competency Council PRG1076HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council 101120075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation is a fundamental epigenetic modification that regulates gene expression and maintains genomic stability. Consequently, DNA methylation remains a key biomarker in cancer research, playing a vital role in diagnosis, prognosis, and tailored treatment strategies. Aberrant methylation patterns enable early cancer detection and therapeutic stratification; however, their complex patterns necessitates advanced analytical tools. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), including deep learning networks and graph-based models, have revolutionized cancer epigenomics by enabling rapid, high-resolution analysis of DNA methylation profiles. Moreover, these technologies are accelerating the development of Multi-Cancer Early Detection (MCED) tests, such as GRAIL's Galleri and CancerSEEK, which improve diagnostic accuracy across diverse cancer types. In this review, we explore the synergy between AI and DNA methylation profiling to advance precision oncology. We first examine the role of DNA methylation as a biomarker in cancer, followed by an overview of DNA profiling technologies. We then assess how AI-driven approaches transform clinical practice by enabling early detection and accurate classification. Despite their promise, challenges remain, including limited sensitivity for early-stage cancers, the black-box nature of many AI algorithms, and the need for validation across diverse populations to ensure equitable implementation. Future directions include integrating multi-omics data, developing explainable AI frameworks, and addressing ethical concerns, such as data privacy and algorithmic bias. By overcoming these gaps, AI-powered epigenetic diagnostics can enable earlier detection, more effective treatments, and improved patient outcomes, globally. In summary, this review synthesizes current advancements in the field and envisions a future where AI and epigenomics converge to redefine cancer diagnostics and therapy.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEpigenomicsNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineBiomarkers, TumorDNA MethylationEarly Detection of CancerEpigenesis, GeneticHumansMachine LearningBiomarkers, TumorArtificial intelligenceCancer epigenomicsDeep learningDNA methylationEarly detectionLiquid biopsyMachine learningMulti-cancer diagnosticsMulti-omicsPan-cancerPrecision oncology

Identifiers

PMID40517231
PMCPMC12166640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.