Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40517230›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025

Validation of a food security experience scale among indigenous populations in Brazil.

Ana Maria Segall-Corrêa, Verônica Gronau Luz, Marta Maria do Amaral Azevedo, Beatriz Rocha Ferreira, Laure Emperaire, Deoclecio Rocco Gruppi, Letícia Marín-Leon, Juliana Souza Andrade Licio, Rafael Pérez-Escamilla

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ana Maria Segall-CorrêaFood Nutrition and Culture Program-PALIN- FIOCRUZ-Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0140-064X
Verônica Gronau LuzFaculty of Health Sciences, Federal University of Grande Dourados, Mato Grosso Do Sul, Dourados, Brazil. veronicaluz@ufgd.edu.br.ORCID 0000-0001-7340-1727
Marta Maria do Amaral AzevedoIndependent researcher, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2909-3725
Beatriz Rocha FerreiraUNICAMP/Independent researcher, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2925-3143
Laure EmperaireFrench Institute for Development, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2368-0964
Deoclecio Rocco GruppiUniversidade Estadual Do Centro-Oeste, UNICENTRO-Paraná-Brazil, Guarapuava, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0252-0045
Letícia Marín-LeonIndependent researcher, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6214-1173
Juliana Souza Andrade LicioIndependent consultant, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0006-4023-5463
Rafael Pérez-EscamillaYale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9416-8039

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico , Brasil CNPq-457160/2013-6Food Agriculture Organization (FAO) in Brazil, in cooperation with the Minister of Social Development- MDS-SESAN-Proj.Coop. FAO/MDS TCP/BRA 3402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessing food and nutrition security among indigenous populations in Brazil is challenging due to their significant cultural and linguistic diversity. This study aimed to validate a national food insecurity measurement scale for indigenous peoples in Brazil (EBIA-I).

methodsA total of 495 indigenous households, from 15 rural communities and one urban area, were included in the analyses. Internal psychometric validity scale was tested with the Rasch Model, and external validity was examined with bivariate analyses.

resultsAn 8-item scale was internally valid (Infit values ranged between 0.7 and 1.3), 6 of the items referred to households with children under 16 years of age, 5 to households only with residents aged 16 years or more, with 3 being common to both. The external validity of the EBIA-I was high, as shown by the significantly lower prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity, in households where some members regularly received income vs. those not receiving any income, 17.5% vs. 30.6%, respectively. Likewise, interviewees who self-reported good/very good health vs. poor/very poor health status were less likely to experience moderate or severe food insecurity (19.1% vs. 34.8%).

conclusionsEBIA-I is a valid scale with strong potential to inform decisions by policymakers and to support indigenous organizations monitoring, addressing, and advocating for policies to prevent or mitigate food and nutrition insecurity in their communities.

Indexed as

Food InsecurityFood SecurityFood SupplyIndians, South AmericanPsychometricsAdolescentAdultBrazilChildFemaleHumansIndigenous PeoplesMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRural PopulationBrazilFood securityIndigenous peoplesMeasurementScaleValidation

Identifiers

PMID40517230
PMCPMC12167585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.