ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
A scoping review of self-supervised representation learning for clinical decision making using EHR categorical data.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Federated learning with continual update for privacy-preserving clinical event prediction across distributed hospitals using MCN-GNN.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The representational bottleneck in rehabilitation AI: from human-cognitive proxies to pathway-based clinical representations.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Adaptive noise-augmented attention for enhancing Transformer fine-tuning on longitudinal medical data.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The widespread adoption of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and deep learning, particularly through Self-Supervised Representation Learning (SSRL) for categorical data, has transformed clinical decision-making. This scoping review, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, examines 46 studies published from January 2019 to April 2024, sourced from PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, ACM, and Web of Science, focusing on SSRL for unlabeled categorical EHR data. The review systematically assesses research trends in building computationally and data-efficient representations for medical tasks, identifying major trends in model families: Transformer-based (43%), Autoencoder-based (28%), and Graph Neural Network-based (17%) models. The analysis highlights scenarios where healthcare institutions can leverage or develop SSRL technologies. It also addresses current limitations in assessing the impact of these technologies and identifies research opportunities to enhance their influence on clinical practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.