Trial reportThe Lancet. Microbe2025
Efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and associated microbiome changes of ibezapolstat compared with vancomycin in adults with Clostridioides difficile infection: a phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, multicentre study.
Trial report in The Lancet. Microbe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ACX-362E [Ibezapolstat] for Oral Treatment of Clostridioides Difficile Infection: A Phase 2A Open-Label Segment Followed by a Phase 2B Double-Blind Vancomycin-Controlled Segment
A Phase 2 Interventional, Open-Label, Single-Arm Trial of Oral Ibezapolstat (ACX-362E) for Treatment and Reduction of Recurrent Clostridioides Difficile Infection in Patients With Multiple Recurrent Infections (IBZ-PATHFINDER)
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbiome-based therapeutics forGut microbes · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota-immune-metabolic crosstalk in acute lung injury: integrating the gut-lung axis from mechanism to therapeutic targeting.Seminars in immunopathology · 2026Review
- Carbadox, a veterinary growth promoter exhibits anticlostridial activity through induction of oxidative stress in Clostridioides difficile.Gut pathogens · 2026Article
- Some Newer Antibiotics Active AgainstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Newer Therapeutics to Selectively KillInfectious disease reports · 2026Review
- How to spare gut microbiota from antibiotic effects? PK-PD based innovative strategies, target specificity, and molecule-to-medicinal properties.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Mechanisms ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClostridioides difficile infection is a common health-care-associated and community-acquired disease with few antibiotic treatment options. We aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and associated microbiome changes of ibezapolstat, an antibiotic that inhibits the PolC-type DNA polymerase III α subunit C, versus vancomycin for the treatment of C difficile infection in adults.
methodsThis was a phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled study conducted at 15 centres, primarily outpatient clinics and hospitals, in the USA. Adults aged 18-90 years, with signs and symptoms of C difficile infection and a positive toxin stool test were recruited. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) with block assignment by study site using an interactive web response system to receive oral ibezapolstat (450 mg twice daily) or oral vancomycin (125 mg every 6 h) for 10 days. Masking was achieved by over-encapsulation of both study drugs (ibezapolstat and vancomycin) and placebo into identically sized capsules. Participants were excluded if they had received more than 24 h of treatment with oral vancomycin, fidaxomicin, or metronidazole for the current episode of C difficile infection before the first dose of study drug or any other antibacterial therapy within 48 h, had had more than three episodes of C difficile infection in the previous 12 months, or had had more than one previous episode in the past 3 months (excluding the current episode). The primary efficacy endpoint was initial clinical cure maintained for at least 48 h after the end of treatment. All individuals with C difficile infection who met inclusion and exclusion criteria, were randomly assigned, and were administered at least one dose of study drug were included in the efficacy analysis. The safety and tolerability of ibezapolstat was assessed in all individuals who were administered at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04247542.
findingsBetween March 12, 2021, and Oct 27, 2023, 39 individuals were assessed for eligibility, 32 of whom were recruited and randomly assigned to ibezapolstat (n=18) or vancomycin (n=14). Two participants were excluded from the efficacy analysis: one participant in the ibezapolstat group withdrew consent before receiving the study drug and another was identified after random assignment as having an exclusion criterion. The primary efficacy analysis included 16 participants in the ibezapolstat group and 14 in the vancomycin group; 24 (80%) participants were female and six (20%) were male. 15 (94%) of 16 participants in the ibezapolstat group had initial clinical cure compared with 14 (100%) of 14 participants in the vancomycin group (treatment difference -6·3% [95% CI -30·7 to 19·4]; p=1·0). Ibezapolstat was well tolerated with a safety profile similar to vancomycin. No drug-related serious adverse events, drug-related treatment withdrawal, or treatment-related deaths occurred in either group.
interpretationIbezapolstat is a Gram-positive selective spectrum antibiotic that shows potential in the treatment of initial C difficile infection and prevention of recurrence. Further clinical development is warranted.
fundingAcurx Pharmaceuticals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.