ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2025
Endoscopic dual-approach laser urethrotomy as a last-option for complex urethral stricture: A case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAnterior urethral stricture is a common complication following pelvic trauma, with posterior urethral involvement observed in 10-25 % of pelvic fractures. Traditional management includes end-to-end anastomosis or urethroplasty, but these approaches may not always be suitable in cases of patient refusal or contraindication. Minimally invasive alternatives, such as endoscopic urethrotomy, are increasingly being considered. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 30-year-old male with a complex anterior urethral stricture following pelvic trauma. Due to the patient's reluctance toward open end-to-end anastomosis, we performed a dual-route endoscopic laser urethrotomy. This hybrid approach, combining transurethral and transvesical Holmium laser access, was performed under spinal anesthesia. The procedure allowed for guidewire passage and urethrotomy enlargement within a 4-minute duration. DISCUSSION: In patients unwilling or unfit for open reconstructive surgery, endoscopic laser urethrotomy can serve as a viable alternative. The hybrid technique provides enhanced access and visualization, offering a minimally invasive solution for complex strictures. Early intervention, in this case within two weeks, helped prevent significant tissue scarring, reducing the risk of recurrence. Additionally, the implementation of a clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) protocol postoperatively further aids in preventing stricture formation and maintaining urethral patency.
conclusionThis case highlights the success of a dual-route endoscopic laser urethrotomy as an effective treatment for anterior urethral stricture, particularly in patients who refuse or are contraindicated for open surgery. While not a substitute for definitive surgical repair, this approach offers a promising, minimally invasive option with favorable short- and medium-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.