ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2025
Does restrictive anorexia nervosa impact brain aging? A machine learning approach to estimate age based on brain structure.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding the Spectrum of Anorexia Nervosa: Clinical Impact, Molecular Insights, and Therapeutic Perspectives.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Brain age as an accurate biomarker of preclinical cognitive decline: evidence from a 12-year longitudinal study.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anorexia nervosa (AN), a severe eating disorder marked by extreme weight loss and malnutrition, leads to significant alterations in brain structure. This study used machine learning (ML) to estimate brain age from structural MRI scans and investigated brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD) as a potential biomarker in AN. Structural MRI scans were collected from female participants aged 10-40 years across two institutions (Boston, USA, and Jena, Germany), including acute AN (acAN; n=113), weight-restored AN (wrAN; n=35), and age-matched healthy controls (HC; n=90). The ML model was trained on 3487 healthy female participants (ages 5-45 years) from ten datasets, using 377 neuroanatomical features extracted from T1-weighted MRI scans. The model achieved strong performance with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.93 years and a correlation of r = 0.88 in HCs. In acAN patients, brain age was overestimated by an average of +2.25 years, suggesting advanced brain aging. In contrast, wrAN participants showed significantly lower brain-PAD than acAN (+0.26 years, p=0.0026) and did not differ from HC (p=0.98), suggesting normalization of brain age estimates following weight restoration. A significant group-by-age interaction effect on predicted brain age (p<0.001) indicated that brain age deviations were most pronounced in younger acAN participants. Brain-PAD in acAN was significantly negatively associated with BMI (r = -0.291, p
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.