ArticleJournal of optometry
A novel approach using a polarized nonius test to evaluate the near point of convergence.
Article in Journal of optometry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a new method for measuring the near point of convergence (NPC) using a Nonius polarized target stimulus, comparing its sensitivity in detecting convergence ability to that of traditional approaches.
methodsIn this prospective study, 65 participants underwent near point of convergence (NPC) measurements using three methods: an accommodative target (NPC1), a penlight with a red filter (NPC2), and a Nonius polarized target (NPC3). Participants also completed the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS). Statistical analyses, including repeated-measures ANOVA and Spearman's correlation, were conducted to assess differences among the methods.
resultsThe Nonius method demonstrated a median break point of 8.37 cm, significantly higher than the other methods, NPC1: 6.63 cm, and NPC2: 7.17 cm. Sensitivity for detecting CI symptoms was 92.6 % for the NPC3, which outperformed NPC1 (77.8 %) and NPC2 (74.1 %). NPC3 exhibited low specificity (7.4 %). Correlations between NPC measurements and CISS scores were weak and nonsignificant, though the strongest correlation was observed for NPC3
conclusionThe Nonius polarized target method shows benefits compared to traditional methods in measuring NPC. This study provides a more sensitive method to measure convergence ability, reducing variability across clinical settings, and enhancing the reliability of assessments in both research and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.