ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2025
The Emergence of Applied Artificial Intelligence in the Realm of Value Based Musculoskeletal Care.
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced systems for intraoperative cartilage evaluation and treatment demonstrate early feasibility and a shift towards integrating artificial intelligence: A scoping review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- Review
- Can Large Language Models Identify When an Upper Extremity Problem Needs Nonurgent Attention? An Assessment of Multiple LLM Chatbots.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo establish the state-of-the-art in applied artificial intelligence (A.I) related to value-based musculoskeletal health care. We performed a literature review of A.I applications in orthopaedics and contextualized these studies based on their alignment with allocative value, technical value, and personal value. We synthesized our findings using descriptive analysis and the Gartner Hype Cycle. RECENT
findings82% of research activity involving A.I and its applications in musculoskeletal care is dominantly focused on technical value, which can be divided into three main sub-groups: imaging and diagnostics, prognostic outcomes and risk factors, and A.I integration within medical devices and care pathways. A.I advancing personal value (18% of studies) is rapidly gaining traction. Relatively few studies (< 1%) focused on allocative value. Emerging applications of A.I in orthopaedics providing 'technical value' include machine learning algorithms for predicting risk and prognosis, diagnostic computer vision algorithms, models advancing surgical robotics; 'personal value' include ambient listening technology, A.I scribes, triage of clinical messages, patient engagement via LLM chatbots, pre-charting applications; and emotional intelligence. Application of these technologies to Gartner's Hype Cycle suggests big data analytics and robotic surgery applications are approaching the plateau of productivity while multiagent / autonomous systems, emotional intelligence, and AI-enabled decision intelligence serve as innovation triggers but are in their infancy. A.I offers the opportunity to improve medical diagnosis, processes, practices and patient experiences and outcomes within musculoskeletal care delivery. While applications enhancing technical value and personal value are being actively researched and rapidly developed in the digital health industry, studies on how A.I provides value through equitable and fair allocation of resources at a population level should be promoted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.