Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40515865›Full record

SynthesisPediatric surgery international2025

Fetiform teratoma: a systematic review with insights into concepts and controversies in differentiating it from fetus-in-fetu.

Seetu Palo, Mishu Mangla, Rohini Motwani, Spandana Gabbeta, Monica Mishra, Poojitha Kalyani Kanikaram

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Seetu PaloDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9956-2246
Mishu ManglaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Hyderabad, India. mishusingla83@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0708-1037
Rohini MotwaniDepartment of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Hyderabad, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2002-5198
Spandana GabbetaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Hyderabad, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5110-3147
Monica MishraDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4786-4012
Poojitha Kalyani KanikaramDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Hyderabad, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7470-7269

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fetiform teratomas are rare tumors mimicking malformed fetuses, posing diagnostic challenges especially when differentiating them from fetus-in-fetu. Fetiform teratomas result from neoplastic processes of germ cells, while fetus-in-fetu arises from aberrant embryogenesis, specifically the inclusion of a parasitic monozygotic twin. This review systematically examined 17 cases of fetiform teratoma identified through strict criteria, excluding cases with vertebral columns or long bones. A thorough search of multiple electronic databases, using the keywords 'fetus-in-fetu,' 'fetus-ex-fetus,' 'homunculus,' or 'fetiform teratoma' was conducted to identify relevant studies published till December 2024. Common locations of fetiform teratoma included the ovaries, retroperitoneum, and sacrococcygeal region, with clinical presentations varying from neonatal masses to pelvic pain in adults. Imaging typically revealed complex masses with solid-cystic components and calcifications, while histopathology demonstrated tissues from all three germ layers, including rare elements like thymic or retinal tissue. Accurate diagnosis relies on integrating imaging, histopathology, and ideally, cytogenetic studies, considered the gold standard for differentiating these entities based on genetic makeup. Surgical excision remains the primary treatment. Post-operative follow-up is recommended due to a small risk of recurrence or malignant transformation. This review underscores the need for standardized diagnostic criteria, primarily focusing on the absence of a vertebral column and long bones for fetiform teratomas. The study's limitations include the small sample size and lack of molecular or genetic data, highlighting the need for further research into the pathogenesis and genetic characteristics of these rare entities.

Indexed as

FetusTeratomaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleFetus-in-FetuHumansCytogenetic testingFetiform teratomaFetus-in-fetuImagingRadiology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.