Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40515815›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025

Comparison of choriocapillaris perfusion between swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography in five different choriocapillaris slabs in patients with intermediate age-related macular degeneration.

Nuria Torrell-Belzach, Eric H Souied, Hoang Mai Le, Manal Benlahbib, Zoe Dobbels, Ambroisine Erasti Gounfle, Xavier X Wang, Camille Jung, Alexandra Miere

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nuria Torrell-BelzachUniversity of Paris Est - Creteil, Creteil, France.
Eric H SouiedUniversity of Paris Est - Creteil, Creteil, France.
Hoang Mai LeDepartment of Ophthalmology, CHI Créteil, 40 Avenue de Verdun, Creteil Cedex, 94000, France.
Manal BenlahbibDepartment of Ophthalmology, CHI Créteil, 40 Avenue de Verdun, Creteil Cedex, 94000, France.
Zoe DobbelsDepartment of Ophthalmology, CHI Créteil, 40 Avenue de Verdun, Creteil Cedex, 94000, France.
Ambroisine Erasti GounfleClinical Research Center, CHIC, Creteil, France.
Xavier X WangClinical Research Center, CHIC, Creteil, France.
Camille JungUniversity of Paris Est - Creteil, Creteil, France.
Alexandra MiereUniversity of Paris Est - Creteil, Creteil, France. alexandramiere@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4123-8210

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze choriocapillaris (CC) perfusion using swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography (SD-OCTA) in five CC slabs in patients with intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD).

methodsThis is a cross-sectional study of 23 eyes of 20 patients who underwent three 3 × 3 mm OCTA, one with SS-OCTA and two with SD-OCTA, a non-averaged scan (V1) and a four-scan volume (V4). Percentage of flow deficits (FD%), average size of FD (µm2), total area of FD (mm2) and number of FD were calculated in different CC slabs (automatic, 11-21 μm, 21-31 μm, 31-41 μm, 16-31 μm).

resultsThere was a statistically significant difference in all parameters and all slabs analyzed, when comparing SS-OCTA versus SD-OCTA V1 and SD-OCTA V1 versus SD-OCTA V4. Nevertheless, when comparing SS-OCTA versus SD-OCTA V4, significant differences were only found for the automatic and the 31-41 μm slab. When comparing the FD% between different slabs on the same device, significant differences were also found.

conclusionQuantification of CC FD% is impacted by the CC slab, the type of OCTA used, and volume averaging in SD-OCTA. Given the significant impact on quantitative results, comparisons between studies and instruments and/or with/without averaging are difficult, even at the same slab depth.

Indexed as

ChoroidFluorescein AngiographyRetinal VesselsTomography, Optical CoherenceAgedAged, 80 and overCapillariesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFundus OculiHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegional Blood FlowRetrospective StudiesVisual AcuityChoriocapillarisFlow deficitIntermediate age-related macular degenerationOptical coherence tomography angiography

Identifiers

PMID40515815
PMCPMC12513984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.