SynthesisOral and maxillofacial surgery2025
Conservative management of pediatric mandibular fractures with cap splints- A systematic review.
Synthesis in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMandible is the second most common bone involved among pediatric facial fractures, and the open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) technique used for its management results in faster bone remodeling and quicker functional recovery. However, it can lead to damage to the periosteum and surrounding tooth buds, and may require a second surgery for removal. Therefore, conservative methods always remain mainstay for management among pediatric patients. This systematic review evaluates the use of cap splints in managing pediatric mandibular fractures and compares this approach with other closed reduction methods.
methodsA priori protocol was prepared, and registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024531959). A comprehensive literature search was performed electronically in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus till December 31, 2024, whereas a grey literature search was carried out on Google Scholar and open grey. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the included studies by using the appropriate Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for case reports, case series, and retrospective cohort studies. For a prospective cohort study, the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of intervention was used for quality assessment.
resultThe database search revealed 2308 records, and 48 records were obtained from grey literature and citation search. A total of 47 studies (28 case reports, 13 case series, three retrospective studies, and three prospective non-randomized interventions) were finally included in the review. The different modalities used were cap splint with luting cement, circum-mandibular wiring, interdental wiring, and arch bar fixation. Among the included studies, one case report and three case series had a high risk of bias. Similarly, all retrospective studies had a high risk of bias.
conclusionCap splint can be recommended as a treatment option for non-displaced pediatric mandibular fractures that do not involve the condyle. Luting cement can be used as an alternative to circum-mandibular wiring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40515765What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.