ReviewAugmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)2025
Unveiling underlying systemic isolation challenges for AAC users.
Review in Augmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The Effects of Video Visual Scene Displays on the Symbolic Communication of Preschool Children with Neurodevelopmental Disabilities and Their Peers in a Shared Video Activity.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- External challenges for individuals who need or use AAC who are learning language: lived experiences, key research findings, and future directions.Augmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985) · 2025Review
- Overcoming barriers to literacy for individuals who need or use AAC: lived experiences, key research findings, and future directions.Augmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985) · 2025Review
- Nothing about AAC users without AAC users: a call for meaningful inclusion in research, technology development, and professional training.Augmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985) · 2025Review
- Dismantling societal barriers that limit people who need or use AAC: lived experiences, key research findings, and future directions.Augmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985) · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This paper examines systemic factors contributing to social isolation for people with communication disabilities, including those who could benefit from, or already rely on, Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) to be heard and understood. Building on existing studies of social isolation that focus on individual risk factors, this paper introduces the concept of systemic isolation, a less recognized form of isolation exacerbated by institutional and societal barriers perpetuating exclusion. By integrating interdisciplinary perspectives from social sciences, public health, and disability studies, the paper critiques established AAC practices, arguing that they often fall short in addressing AAC users' broader social and emotional needs. Specific examples illustrate how systemic barriers work to isolate AAC users - including simplified communication systems, overly restrictive privacy policies, lack of access to collective support and problem-solving, and prioritization of independence over interdependence. These practices exacerbate isolation beyond the risks posed by communication disability alone. There is a moral imperative to address these issues. This paper encourages collaboration between AAC users, researchers, and service providers to reevaluate communication support goals with a focus on preventing isolation and enhancing relational support. The hope is to foster environments that promote greater connection, well-being, and equitable participation for AAC users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.