Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40515619›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2025

Ruegeria strains promote growth and morphogenesis of the giant coenocytic alga Bryopsis.

Kanta K Ochiai, Gohta Goshima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kanta K OchiaiSugashima Marine Biological Laboratory, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Toba 517-0004, Japan.
Gohta GoshimaSugashima Marine Biological Laboratory, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Toba 517-0004, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7524-8770

Funding

KAKENHI 22K19308KAKENHI 23K23907Shiodamari Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An evolutionarily intriguing life form among extant organisms is the giant coenocyte, exemplified by green macroalgae in the order Bryopsidales. In these algae, cell separation does not follow nuclear division, resulting in a body composed of a single multinucleated cell. How a single cell grows to over 10 cm and undergoes characteristic morphogenesis without cell division or differentiation remains poorly understood. Macroalgae are known to associate with numerous microbes, and in some cases, these interactions influence algal cell division and differentiation. Here, we show that specific bacterial strains can promote the growth and morphogenesis of the coenocytic macroalga Bryopsis. Among >100 bacterial isolates obtained from Bryopsis, four strains belonging to the genus Ruegeria were found to accelerate the growth of the main axis and induce side-branch formation when co-cultured with the alga. The same effects were observed using conditioned seawater in which Ruegeria had been pre-cultured and subsequently removed. Seasonal microbiome analysis revealed that cultured Bryopsis associates with hundreds of bacterial species, exhibiting seasonal variations in community composition. However, Ruegeria was one of the few bacterial genera consistently associated with the cultured strain, suggesting a symbiotic relationship. Notably, although Ruegeria was not detected in Bryopsis strains isolated from other regions, its effects on growth and morphogenesis were observed in co-culture experiments. These findings suggest that Bryopsis, like multicellular macroalgae, utilizes associated bacteria for growth and development without strict specificity.

Indexed as

ChlorophytaMorphogenesisBacteriomeBryopsiscoenocytemeta-amplicon sequencingRuegeriaseaweed

Identifiers

PMID40515619
PMCPMC12621095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.