Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40515598›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of medicine2025

Opioid-free anaesthesia to reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting after lower extremity wound surgery: a randomised double-blind crossover trial.

Ya-Juan Zhu, Yao-Yu Ying, Hua-Yue Liu, Long Qian, Hong Liu, Fu-Hai Ji, Ke Peng

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Ketamine enhancement of dexmedetomidine attenuation of methamphetamine-induced agitation in rats.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ya-Juan ZhuDepartment of Anaesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Yao-Yu YingDepartment of Medical Affairs, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Hua-Yue LiuDepartment of Anaesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Long QianDepartment of Anaesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Hong LiuDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Fu-Hai JiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6649-665X
Ke PengDepartment of Anaesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2879-1759

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common complications after surgery. Opioid use is a significant risk factor. We utilised a crossover design to test this hypothesis in the same individuals that opioid-free anaesthesia (OFA) compared with opioid-inclusive anaesthesia reduces PONV.

methodsThis randomised double-blind crossover trial included adult patients undergoing two surgical procedures for lower extremity wounds under general anaesthesia. Each patient received both OFA (i.v. lidocaine, esketamine, dexmedetomidine and propofol) and opioid-inclusive anaesthesia (sufentanil and propofol); which came first was determined by randomisation. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV during the first 48 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the severity of PONV, use of rescue antiemetics, postoperative pain, need for rescue analgesia, adverse events, time to extubation, and length of recovery room stay.

resultsSixty-six patients completed this study (mean age 53 years, 36% female). The median washout period was 9 days. Compared with opioid-inclusive anaesthesia, OFA reduced the incidence of PONV 0-48 h postoperatively (5% vs. 23%, odds ratio [OR] = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.03-0.55,

conclusionThis crossover trial demonstrates that OFA reduced PONV following lower extremity wound surgery, providing compelling evidence for the administration of OFA to enhance perioperative care. REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2200061511 (https://www.chictr.org.cn).

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralLower ExtremityPostoperative Nausea and VomitingAdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidAntiemeticsCross-Over StudiesDexmedetomidineDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansKetamineLidocaineMaleMiddle AgedAnalgesics, OpioidAntiemeticsDexmedetomidineKetamineLidocainePropofolSufentanilLower extremityopioid-free anaesthesiapostoperative nausea and vomitingwound surgery

Identifiers

PMID40515598
PMCPMC12168384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.