Observational studyEuropean journal of neurology2025
Development of Machine-Learning-Based Models for Detection of Cognitive Impairment in Patients Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis.
Observational study in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of Machine-Learning-Based Models for Detection of Cognitive Impairment in Patients Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis.European journal of neurology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCognitive impairment is common but frequently undiagnosed in the dialysis population. We aimed to develop and validate a quick and accurate screening tool using machine-learning-based approaches in them.
methodsIn this cross-sectional observational study, we administered the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) in 508 hemodialysis patients and randomly divided them into a derivation set (70%) and a validation set (30%). Using three to five key items from MMSE and CASI as predictors, we developed six machine learning models, including Lasso, classification and regression tree (CART), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting, support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural networks to identify those with a CASI score below the 20th percentile of age- and education-matched norms in the derivation set. We then evaluated the predictive performance of these models in the validation set.
resultsThe derivation samples (n = 357) had a mean (SD) age of 64.13 (11.92) years and a mean education level of 8.76 (4.91) years. Around 40% of participants had a CASI score below the 20th percentile. Among all models, the RF model achieved the highest performance of prediction, with an accuracy of 0.94, an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95, and an F1 score of 0.92 in the validation set. The other models, except for CART, performed equally well in terms of AUC.
conclusionsOur study demonstrates that using machine-learning models, we can identify patients with impaired cognition with only several questions in CASI and MMSE within 5 min.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.