ArticleThe oncologist2025
Medicare spending and use of subcutaneous biologic formulations with hyaluronidase.
Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drugs anticipated to be selected for Medicare price negotiation in 2026 for implementation in 2028.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Article
- Halting hyaluronidase hopping to maintain the integrity of Medicare drug price negotiation.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several intravenously administered biologic drugs have been reformulated with hyaluronidase to enable subcutaneous delivery. This offers greater convenience and fewer infusion reactions while also increasing overall spending if biosimilar competition for the subcutaneous versions begins later than for the original intravenous versions. As of December 2024, at least 9 biologics had investigational or approved hyaluronidase versions. Medicare spending on these drugs totaled $10.3B in 2022. For 4 of these drugs, hyaluronidase versions accounted for 5%-83% of Medicare spending in 2022, with hyaluronidase versions accounting for the highest share of spending for pertuzumab-trastuzumab and daratumumab and a lower share of spending for 2 drugs that had biosimilar competition for the original versions: rituximab and trastuzumab. The benefits of subcutaneous hyaluronidase versions must be balanced against the challenges that come with higher prices if these versions are introduced before biosimilar competition begins for the original versions. Policymakers should ensure manufacturers cannot use "hyaluronidase hopping" to delay biosimilar competition or eligibility for Medicare price negotiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.