Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40515438›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2026

From cramming to binge-watching: Integrating documentary-based assessment into a pharmacology and toxicology curriculum-a qualitative study.

Narin Akrawi, Heleen van der Sijs, Floor van Rosse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Narin AkrawiDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7054-0659
Heleen van der SijsDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Floor van RosseDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsIn the context of pharmacology and toxicology education, there is a growing shift toward programmatic assessment models that prioritize longitudinal learning, reflection and development of higher-order cognitive skills. As part of this transition, we are exploring alternative and more meaningful forms of assessment. This qualitative study investigates students' perceptions of an innovative assessment format-documentary-based assessment-introduced in the interdisciplinary Minor ToXiC course, which covers the life cycle of a medicine and includes topics such as pharmacology and toxicology.

methodsAs part of the assessment programme within Minor ToXiC, students watched selected documentaries and completed an assessment consisting of 6 open-ended questions. Questions 1- 5 prompted students to reflect on the documentary content and link it to the course material of the minor, while question 6 invited them to evaluate how they experienced this form of assessment. Responses to question 6 were analysed thematically.

resultsThree main categories emerged from the themes. First, students highlighted the educational value of documentaries, describing how visual and narrative elements helped them better retain information, connect theory to practice, and reflect critically on ethical, social and pharmacological dimensions of real-world cases. Second, the format was perceived as motivating due to the autonomy it allowed. Third, students identified key structural conditions necessary for the effectiveness of this format.

conclusionOverall, documentary-based assessment appears to be a promising addition in a programmatic assessment-based curriculum. To optimize its impact, careful attention must be paid to the design, timing and integration of this assessment method within the curriculum.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducational MeasurementPharmacologyToxicologyCognitive ReflectionHumansQualitative Researchassessment in pharmacologydocumentary‐based assessmentprogrammatic assessmentreflective learningstudent perceptions

Identifiers

PMID40515438
PMCPMC13421058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.