ArticlePhysiological reports2025
A comparison of human skeletal muscle cell maturation in 2D versus 3D culture: A quantitative proteomic study.
Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- 3D skeletal muscle model recapitulating the myostatin knockout phenotypic and mitochondrial metabolic features.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- MicroAge mission: experimental design and hardware for a bespoke culture system supporting tissue-engineered skeletal muscle.NPJ microgravity · 2026Article
- Genetic Manipulation in Organoid Models and Their Applications in Central Nervous System Pathologies.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- A comparison of human skeletal muscle cell maturation in 2D versus 3D culture: A quantitative proteomic study.Physiological reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Compared with 2D monolayers, 3D models more closely mimic native muscle tissue and allow functional measurements. A more complete understanding of how culture conditions and duration affect myotube maturity/function is crucial for validating the transition to 3D systems. Human skeletal muscle cells were cultured as 2D monolayers or within 3D hydrogels for up to 21 days. Quantitative proteomic analysis and functional measurements were conducted to evaluate muscle cell differentiation. Myoblasts differentiated into myotubes by 8 days in both environments; however, at Day 8, 3D constructs exhibited a predominantly slow-twitch phenotype, compared with the mixed fiber type of 2D monolayers. By Day 21, 3D constructs demonstrated enhanced mitochondrial maturity, extracellular matrix remodeling, and a fast-twitch phenotype, indicated by increased myosin-2 abundance (Log2(FC)>1.29, p <0.05). Passive tension increased by >20% following prolonged culture of 3D muscle constructs, but contractile forces reduced by >40%. This study provides a comprehensive proteomic profile of human skeletal muscle cells in 2D and 3D, demonstrating that 3D culture promoted myotube maturity and highlighting the importance of selecting appropriate culture conditions. Data suggest 8 days of differentiation as ideal for achieving peak contractile force in 3D constructs, providing optimal models for testing interventions aimed at preserving muscle function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.