ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Securing diagonal integration of multimodal single-cell data against ambiguous mapping.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unifying multimodal single-cell data with a mixture-of-experts β-variational autoencoder framework.Genome research · 2026Article
- Unifying multimodal single-cell data with a mixture-of-expertsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationRecent advances in single-cell multimodal omics technologies enable the exploration of cellular systems at unprecedented resolution, leading to the rapid generation of multimodal datasets that require sophisticated integration methods. Diagonal integration has emerged as a flexible solution for integrating heterogeneous single-cell data without relying on shared cells or features. However, the absence of anchoring elements introduces the risk of artificial integrations, where cells across modalities are incorrectly aligned due to ambiguous mapping.
resultsTo address this challenge, we propose SONATA (Securing diagOnal iNtegrATion against Ambiguous) mapping, a novel diagnostic method designed to detect potential artificial integrations resulting from ambiguous mappings in diagonal data integration. SONATA identifies ambiguous alignments by quantifying cell-cell ambiguity within the data manifold, ensuring that biologically meaningful integrations are distinguished from spurious ones. It is worth noting that SONATA is not designed to replace any existing pipelines for diagonal data integration; instead, SONATA works simply as an add-on to an existing pipeline for achieving more reliable integration. Through a comprehensive evaluation on both simulated and real multimodal single-cell datasets, we observe that artificial integrations in diagonal data integration are widespread yet surprisingly overlooked, occurring across all mainstream diagonal integration methods. We demonstrate SONATA's ability to safeguard against misleading integrations and provide actionable insights into potential integration failures across mainstream methods. Our approach offers a robust framework for ensuring the reliability and interpretability of multimodal single-cell data integration. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code is available at (https://github.com/batmen-lab/SONATA).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.