Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40514784›Full record

ArticleAnatomical sciences education2025

Do active learning techniques promote higher academic performance in an online graduate anatomy course?

L J Bradley, K E Meyer, M S Kerr, S D Maddux, A J Heck, R E Reeves, E K Handler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

L J BradleyDepartment of Radiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
K E MeyerDepartment of Physician Assistant Studies and Executive Director of Division of Academic Innovation, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
M S KerrSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
S D MadduxDepartment of Physiology and Anatomy, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
A J HeckMicrobiology, Immunology, & Genetics, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
R E ReevesDepartment of Physiology and Anatomy, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
E K HandlerAnatomy and Cell Biology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Funding

American Association for Anatomy
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human anatomy is a foundational course in graduate health professional programs. Given the increased enrollment in anatomy courses, along with the development of new technologies, institutions are increasingly compelled to provide alternative course formats, including online learning. Similarly, higher education is increasingly transitioning from traditional lecture-based learning to methods that allow students to actively participate in their own learning process (i.e., active learning). Active learning has been shown to have many benefits, including enhanced academic performance. Few studies have investigated the impact of active learning techniques on students' academic performance in online graduate anatomy courses. This study investigates differences in examination performance following participation in four active learning techniques (jigsaw, team-learning module, concept mapping, and question constructing). Specifically, this study investigated whether academic performance differed between learning objectives assigned to students during an active learning activity compared to non-assigned learning objectives for each unit. One hundred seventy (170) students completed the online anatomy course. Results showed that academic performance generally did not significantly differ between students who participated in active learning (regardless of technique) and a control group. However, students who participated in active learning were found to perform significantly better on examination questions specifically related to the objective they were required to teach compared to the objectives they learned from their peers. The results of this study suggest that the benefits of active learning on academic performance are largely attributable to preparatory processes required for peer teaching, as recipient peer-learners appear to gain minimal benefits from active learning.

Indexed as

Academic PerformanceAnatomyComputer-Assisted InstructionEducation, DistanceEducation, GraduateProblem-Based LearningAdultCurriculumEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultactive learninge‐learninghigher educationonline learningstudent performance

Identifiers

PMID40514784
PMCPMC12413479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.