Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40514764›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

Testing for a General Changepoint in Medical and Psychometric Studies: Changes Detection and Sample Size Planning.

Nicoletta D'Angelo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nicoletta D'AngeloDepartment of Economics, Business, and Statistics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8878-5986

Funding

GRINS -Growing Resilient, INclusive and Sustainable project CUP C93C22005270001GRINS -Growing Resilient, INclusive and Sustainable project GRINS PE00000018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper introduces a new method for change detection in medical and psychometric studies based on the recently introduced pseudo Score statistic, for which the sampling distribution under the alternative hypothesis has been determined. Our approach has the advantage of simplicity in its computation, eliminating the need for resampling or simulations to obtain critical values. Additionally, it comes with known null and alternative distributions, facilitating easy calculations for power levels and sample size planning. The paper indeed also discusses the topic of power analysis in segmented regression, namely the estimation of sample size or power level when the study data being collected focuses on a covariate expected to affect the mean response via a piecewise relationship with an unknown breakpoint. We run simulation studies showing that our method outperforms other Tests for a Change Point (TFCP) with both normally distributed and binary data and carry out two real data analyses on genomic data and SAT critical reading data. The proposed test contributes to the framework of medical and psychometric research, and it is available on the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) and in a more user-friendly Shiny App, both illustrated at the end of the paper.

Indexed as

PsychometricsComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansModels, StatisticalSample Sizechangepointspower analysispsychometrysample sizesegmented regression

Identifiers

PMID40514764
PMCPMC12166113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.