Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40514758›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2025

Protocol of testing the feasibility and acceptability of two brief dyadic sleep interventions for adults with cancer and their bedpartner caregivers.

Youngmee Kim, Thomas C Tsai, Jennifer L Steel, Alberto R Ramos, Jean-Philippe Laurenceau, Wendy M Troxel

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06569693 (Dyadic Sleep Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06569693 narecruitingnot on this map

Dyadic Sleep Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MiamiRan2024 to 2026Enrolled152ConditionsGastrointestinal CancerArmsMy Sleep Our Sleep (MSOS) Program, Brief Behavioral Treatment for Insomnia (BBTI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Youngmee KimDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA. ykim@miami.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3109-6362
Thomas C TsaiDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Jennifer L SteelUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Alberto R RamosUniversity of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Jean-Philippe LaurenceauUniversity of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Wendy M TroxelRAND, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

Dyadic Sleep Intervention for Patients with GI Cancer and Their CaregiversR21NR021083 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CORAL GABLES · PI KIM, YOUNGMEE · 2024 to 2024
$410k
Community Foundation for Brevard GR023751NIH NHLBI T32HL007426-45NINR NIH HHS R21 NR021083NINR NIH HHS R21NR021086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSleep disturbance is common and problematic among both patients with cancer and their bedpartner caregivers. Although one's sleep affects the partner's sleep, existing cognitive-behavioral interventions have rarely targeted sleep problems of patients and caregivers simultaneously.

methodsThis protocol is to test the feasibility and acceptability of two brief dyadic sleep interventions [My Sleep Our Sleep (MSOS) and Brief Behavioral Treatment for Insomnia for Couples with Cancer (BBTI-CC)] that are designed to reduce sleep disturbance and improve health-related quality of life in adults with cancer and their bedpartner caregivers. Participants (patient-caregiver dyads) will be randomly assigned to either intervention condition. Both interventions will be delivered weekly for 4 weeks. Questionnaire, daily sleep logs, and objectively assessed sleep data will be collected before the intervention (T1), 1-week (T2) and 8-week (T3) after conclusion of the intervention. Participant-reported satisfaction with the intervention will be assessed at the end of each of the four intervention sessions. DISCUSSION: We estimate 50 dyads will be enrolled (50 patients and 50 caregivers; 25 dyads in each intervention condition). In both conditions, we expect > 75% of eligible and screened dyads will consent to participate within the enrollment period, > 80% of enrolled dyads will complete the intervention, and > 80% of participants will report satisfaction across all acceptability measures. Additionally, we will explore if both MSOS and BBTI-CC reveal a similar effect on overall sleep disturbance, insomnia severity, and health-related quality of life. Results will inform the feasibility and acceptability of conducting brief dyadic sleep interventions and provide preliminary data to guide further refinement of intervention content and procedure for adult patients with cancer and their bedpartner caregivers in a full trial.

trial registrationNCT06569693 Clinicaltrials.gov, registered August 22 2024, https://register. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S000ESX9&selectaction=Edit&uid=U0005GPT&ts=2&cx=nb0aq5 .

Indexed as

Adult cancerBrief dyadic sleep interventionCouplesPatient-caregiver dyadSleep intervention protocol

Identifiers

PMID40514758
PMCPMC12166573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.