ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Validation of the self-report quantified Tuberous Sclerosis Complex-Associated Neuropsyciatric Disorders Checklist (TAND-SQ).
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) is a rare multi-system genetic disorder characterised by benign growths in multiple body systems. TSC-Associated Neuropsychiatric Disorders (TAND) are very common in individuals with TSC, but families often struggle to access appropriate clinical care. To address this gap, the new TAND-SQ Checklist allows individuals with TSC or their caregivers to self-report and quantify characteristics of TAND. The 33 items make up seven natural TAND clusters and an eighth cluster reflecting psychosocial difficulties in individuals with TSC and their caregivers. Respondents rate items as having ever been present to generate cluster scores (CS), and rate item severity (over the last month) on a 10-point scale to generate cluster severity scores (CSS
methodsA descriptive group design was used. Two convenience samples with existing clinical data were recruited from the TSC Alliance Natural History Database (NHD) in the USA (n = 69), and from the Developmental Synaptopathies Consortium Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) study based at Boston and Cincinnati Children's Hospitals (n = 23), totalling 92 participants.
resultsAnalyses showed good internal consistency for CS (Cronbach's alphas: 0.67-0.89) and CSS
conclusionsFindings provide support for the reliability and validity of the CS, CSS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.