ArticleGenome biology2025
cuteFC: regenotyping structural variants through an accurate and efficient force-calling method.
Article in Genome biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanopore sequencing combined with adaptive sampling and NanoExpansion enables accurate characterization of repeat expansion disorders.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Telomere-to-telomere CHM13 reference reveals missing truth variants and improves deep learning-based variant calling in long-read sequencing data.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026Article
- A trio-based long-read sequencing workflow identifies a pathogenic transposable element insertion in a previously undiagnosed patient.Journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- dicast: a machine learning method for accurate structural variant detection from short-read sequencing data.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Leveraging ONT move table values for signal aware variant calling.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Article
- Disruption of CTCF binding by germline non-coding variants inmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- NanoVar: a comprehensive workflow for structural variant detection to uncover the genome's hidden patterns.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- cuteHap: Haplotype-Aware Structural Variant Detection in Phased Long-Read Sequencing Data.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- cuteSV-OL: a real-time structural variation detection framework for nanopore sequencing devices.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- A simple method to efficiently generate structural variation in plants.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Author Correction: cuteFC: regenotyping structural variants through an accurate and efficient force-calling method.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Interlaboratory evaluation of high molecular weight DNA extraction methods for long-read sequencing and structural variant analysis.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- The promise and challenges of characterizing genome-wide structural variants: A case study in a critically endangered parrot.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
- K-mer analysis of long-read alignment pileups for structural variant genotyping.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- SVDF: enhancing structural variation detect from long-read sequencing via automatic filtering strategies.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- SVUPP: Pre-phasing long reads improves structural variant genotyping.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long-read sequencing technologies have great potential for the comprehensive discovery of structural variations (SVs). However, accurate genotype assignment for SVs remains challenging due to unavoidable sequencing errors, limited coverage, and the complexity of SVs. Herein, we propose cuteFC, which employs self-adaptive clustering along with a multiallele-aware clustering to achieve accurate SV regenotyping through a force-calling approach. cuteFC also applies a Genome Position Scanner algorithm to improve its application efficiency. Benchmarking evaluations demonstrate that cuteFC outperforms state-of-the-art methods with 2-5% higher F1 scores and constructs a higher-quality genomic atlas with minimal computational resources. cuteFC is available at https://github.com/Meltpinkg/cuteFC and https://zenodo.org/records/14671406 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.