Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40514662›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2025

Self-management interventions for adult haemodialysis patients: a scoping review of randomized controlled trials.

Nina Katharina Friedrich, Nico Schmitt, Helena Hruby, Christiane Kugler

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nina Katharina FriedrichFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 153, 79110, Freiburg, Germany.
Nico SchmittFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 153, 79110, Freiburg, Germany.
Helena HrubyFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 153, 79110, Freiburg, Germany.
Christiane KuglerFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 153, 79110, Freiburg, Germany. christiane.kugler@uniklinik-freiburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective self-management is crucial for individuals undergoing haemodialysis to prevent complications, which can lead to morbidity and mortality. However, among this population self-management behaviours are often inadequate. To improve patient outcomes interventions that promote and enhance self-management behaviours are essential.

objectiveThis study aimed to provide an overview of the current body of evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on self-management interventions for haemodialysis patients. First, we aimed to present the outcomes investigated, their corresponding measurement tools and the significant results of each study. Second, we examined the presence of various self-management components and activities within the interventions. We aimed to identify new, underrepresented, and absent self-management components and activities found in the interventions.

methodsFollowing the scoping review process, a systematic literature search was conducted across six databases (MedLine All, Emcare, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane) to identify relevant studies. The search focused on RCTs involving adult haemodialysis patients. The review utilized the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statements for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) approach. The included studies were required to address either self-management theories or self-management support interventions. Data were synthesized using a tabular format. The findings were analysed using content analysis based on the self-management concept.

resultsOverall, fourteen articles from eight countries were included. The findings illustrate the broad thematic scope of self-management interventions. Most frequent intervention outcomes were 'quality of life', 'self-management' and 'self-efficacy'. The most used instrument was 'Strategies used by people to promote health' for measuring self-care self-efficacy. All authors of the included studies reported significant results of the intervention. The content analysis identified commonly employed self-management components and activities for haemodialysis patients, such as 'emotion regulation', 'medication adherence', and 'diet management'. It revealed underrepresented (infection control), absent (smoking cessation), and new (stress management) self-management dimensions.

conclusionThis innovative scoping review represents the first comprehensive overview of self-management intervention outcomes, their measurements, and significant results while simultaneously highlighting the complex self-management components and activities that haemodialysis patients must navigate on a daily basis. The identified gaps and opportunities underscore important areas for future intervention development. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicRenal DialysisSelf CareSelf-ManagementAdultHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDialysisEnd-stage kidney diseaseRandomized controlled trialsScoping reviewSelf-management

Identifiers

PMID40514662
PMCPMC12166570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.