Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40514569›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2025

Pangolin hunting in southeast Nigeria is motivated more by local meat consumption than international demand for scales.

Charles A Emogor, Samuel K Wasser, Lauren Coad, Ben Balmford, Daniel J Ingram, Amayaa Wijesinghe, Benedict A Atsu, Frederick Bassey, Dominic S Ogu, Ngozi Okafor and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Making CITES count for sharks and rays.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Charles A EmogorConservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. emogorcharles@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9589-2931
Samuel K WasserCenter for Environmental Forensic Science, Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2678-1904
Lauren CoadCenter for International Forestry Research and World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF), Bogor, Indonesia.
Ben BalmfordLand, Environment, Economics and Policy Institute, Economics Department, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Daniel J IngramDurrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Natural Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5843-220X
Amayaa WijesingheCARE International UK, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2168-3376
Benedict A AtsuPangolin Protection Network, Calabar, Nigeria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0420-6166
Frederick BasseyPangolin Protection Network, Calabar, Nigeria.
Dominic S OguPangolin Protection Network, Calabar, Nigeria.
Ngozi OkaforPangolin Protection Network, Calabar, Nigeria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4529-8197
Andrew BalmfordConservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0144-3589

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thousands of species are threatened by overexploitation, often driven by a complex interplay of local and global demand for various products-a dynamic frequently overlooked in wildlife trade policies. African pangolins, regarded as the world's most trafficked wild mammals, are a heavily exploited group for different reasons across geographic scales. However, it remains unclear how far the burgeoning trafficking of their scales to Asia for medicine drives their exploitation compared with local meat demand. Here, using data collected from questionnaires distributed to 809 hunters and meat vendors in Nigeria, the world's biggest hub for pangolin trafficking, we show that targeted pangolin hunts are uncommon in the country's largest pangolin stronghold. Instead, 97% of pangolins are captured opportunistically or during general hunting, with 98% of these caught for meat and mostly either eaten by hunters (71%) or traded locally (27%), potentially due to the meat's exceptionally high palatability. Meanwhile, around 70% of scales are discarded, with less than 30% sold. In addition, local meat prices are three to four times higher than those for scales. Our findings highlight the need to consider entire wildlife trade chains in international policies.

Indexed as

HuntingMeatMotivationPangolinsAnimalsCommerceNigeria

Identifiers

PMID40514569
PMCPMC12328206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.