ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Multi-class transformer-based segmentation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and surrounding structures in CT imaging: a multi-center evaluation.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAccurate segmentation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and surrounding anatomical structures is critical for diagnosis, treatment planning, and outcome assessment. This study proposes a deep learning-based framework to automate multi-class segmentation in CT images, comparing the performance of four state-of-the-art architectures. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective multi-center study included 3265 patients from six institutions. Four deep learning models-UNet, nnU-Net, UNETR, and Swin-UNet-were trained using five-fold cross-validation on data from five centers and tested independently on a sixth center (n = 569). Preprocessing included intensity normalization, voxel resampling, and standardized annotation for six structures: PDAC lesion, pancreas, veins, arteries, pancreatic duct, and common bile duct. Evaluation metrics included Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Intersection over Union (IoU), directed Hausdorff Distance (dHD), Average Symmetric Surface Distance (ASSD), and Volume Overlap Error (VOE). Statistical comparisons were made using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Bonferroni correction.
resultsSwin-UNet outperformed all models with a mean validation DSC of 92.4% and test DSC of 90.8%, showing minimal overfitting. It also achieved the lowest dHD (4.3 mm), ASSD (1.2 mm), and VOE (6.0%) in cross-validation. Per-class DSCs for Swin-UNet were consistently higher across all anatomical targets, including challenging structures like the pancreatic duct (91.0%) and bile duct (91.8%). Statistical analysis confirmed the superiority of Swin-UNet (p < 0.001). All models showed generalization capability, but Swin-UNet provided the most accurate and robust segmentation across datasets.
conclusionsTransformer-based architectures, particularly Swin-UNet, enable precise and generalizable multi-class segmentation of PDAC and surrounding anatomy. This framework has potential for clinical integration in PDAC diagnosis, staging, and therapy planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40514460What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.