ArticleNPJ precision oncology2025
Augmenting precision medicine via targeted RNA-Seq detection of expressed mutations.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards an ecosystem of clinical decision support tools for precision cancer medicine.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Cancer and Aging Biomarkers: Classification, Early Detection Technologies and Emerging Research Trends.Biosensors · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In precision medicine, DNA-based assays are currently necessary but not always sufficient for predicting therapeutic efficacy of cancer drugs based on the mutational findings in a patient's tumor specimen. Most drugs target proteins, but it is challenging and not yet cost-effective to perform high-throughput proteomics profiling, including mutational analysis, on cancer specimens. RNA may be an effective mediator for bridging the "DNA to protein divide" and provide more clarity and therapeutic predictability for precision oncology. While RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has been increasingly used alongside DNA cancer mutation screening panels to assess the impact of variants on gene transcript expression and splicing, comprehensive evaluations of RNA panels and the integration of expressed mutation data analytics to supplement DNA panels are still limited. In this study, we conducted targeted RNA-seq on a reference sample set for expressed variant detection to explore its potential capability to complement DNA variant results or detect variants independently. The results indicated that, with a carefully controlled false positive rate ensuring high accuracy, RNA-seq uniquely identified variants with significant pathological relevance that were missed by DNA-seq, demonstrating its potential to uncover clinically actionable mutations. On the other hand, while some variants were detected by both approaches, others were missed by one or the other, reflecting either the nature of these variants or limitations of the bioinformatics tools used. Variants missed by RNA-seq are often not expressed or expressed at very low levels, suggesting they may be of lower clinical relevance. Incorporating RNA-seq into clinical biomarker panels will ultimately advance precision medicine and improve patient outcomes by improving the strength and reliability of somatic mutation findings for clinical diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of therapeutic efficacy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.