Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40514399›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2025

Establishing predictive machine learning models for drug responses in patient derived cell culture.

Abbi Abdel-Rehim, Oghenejokpeme Orhobor, Gareth Griffiths, Larisa Soldatova, Ross D King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Organoids for disease modeling and treatment: state-of-the-art.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abbi Abdel-RehimDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. aar52@cam.ac.uk.
Oghenejokpeme OrhoborDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Gareth GriffithsValiRx Plc, Nottingham, UK.
Larisa SoldatovaDepartment of Computing, University of London, London, UK.
Ross D KingDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/R022925/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of personalised medicine in cancer therapy is becoming increasingly important. There already exist drugs administered specifically for patients with tumours presenting well-defined genetic mutations. However, the field is still in its infancy, and personalised treatments are far from being standard of care. Personalised medicine is often associated with the utilisation of omics data. Yet, implementation of multi-omics data has proven difficult, due to the variety and scale of the information within the data, as well as the complexity behind the myriad of interactions taking place within the cell. An alternative approach to precision medicine is to employ a function-based profile of cells. This involves screening a range of drugs against patient-derived cells (or derivative organoids and xenograft models). Here we demonstrate a proof-of-concept, where a collection of drug screens against a highly diverse set of patient-derived cell lines, are leveraged to identify putative treatment options for a 'new patient'. We show that this methodology is highly efficient in ranking the drugs according to their activity towards the target cells. We argue that this approach offers great potential, as activities can be efficiently imputed from various subsets of the drug-treated cell lines that do not necessarily originate from the same tissue type.

Identifiers

PMID40514399
PMCPMC12166088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.