ArticleNPJ precision oncology2025
Clonal hematopoiesis in metastatic urothelial and renal cell carcinoma.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is an age-related expansion of white blood cell (WBC) progenitors linked to risk of hematological malignancy. Patients with cancer have increased CH prevalence compared to healthy populations, but the characteristics and relevance of CH in advanced urological cancers are unknown. We interrogated CH and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in 299 patients with metastatic urothelial or renal cell carcinoma using error-corrected targeted sequencing of matched WBC DNA and plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA). 73% of patients carried CH variants at ≥0.25% allele frequency, with 13% exhibiting large CH populations marked by variants ≥10%. CH presence, clone size, and genotype did not impact patient survival. However, CH variants frequently affected solid cancer driver genes and were not individually discriminable from ctDNA variants based on cfDNA features including fragment length. In contrast, matched WBC DNA sequencing to ≥25% of cfDNA depth sufficiently resolved CH from ctDNA variants. Serial profiling revealed ctDNA and CH temporal dynamics including treatment-related expansion of PPM1D-mutated CH clones following platinum chemotherapy. Our data reveal the molecular landscape of CH in urological cancers and suggest that CH interferes in clinical ctDNA genotyping. We urge test providers to comprehensively filter CH from ctDNA results using matched WBC sequencing and propose a cost-effective framework for its integration into existing plasma-only assays.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.