ArticleBMJ open2025
Exploring the sexual and reproductive health and rights policies and their relationship to the Termination of Pregnancy Act (1977) and bodily autonomy and integrity in Zimbabwe: a multimethod research protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn Zimbabwe, pregnancy termination is generally prohibited unless and only if the circumstances are in sync with the conditions stipulated in the Termination of Pregnancy (ToP) Act of 1977. This raises questions about the modern-day rights of bodily autonomy and integrity (BAI). Funded by the AIDS and Rights Alliance for Southern Africa, this study, therefore, seeks to review and analyse sexual and reproductive health and rights policies and how they relate to the ToP Act (1977) and BAI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will use a concurrent multimethod approach. First, policies related to the ToP and bodily autonomy and integration will be reviewed and analysed using the policy analysis triangle. Concurrently, a qualitative and quantitative survey will be conducted on purposively selected key informants and focus group discussions with purposively selected women and men, as well as 200 stratified selected women. Qualitative findings will be recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed using MAXQDA V.20 Pro. Simultaneously, the quantitative output will be collected using KoboCollect, exported into Excel and analysed using both Excel and STATA. The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) framework and the Basic Logic Model will guide the triangulation of the findings and development of a policy brief. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the National University of Science and Technology Institutional Review Board at Bulawayo, Zimbabwe (Ethics Number: NUST/IRB/2023/23). Written consent would also be sought from the participants. A policy brief would be developed and shared with key stakeholders. At least three manuscripts would emanate from this study and will be submitted for publication in reputable peer-reviewed journals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.