ArticleOpen heart2025
Continuing evaluation of atrial fibrillation detection after cryptogenic stroke: 2-year findings from a multicentre study with Confirm Rx ICM.
Article in Open heart, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03505801 (Confirm Rx Insertable Cardiac Monitor SMART Registry), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Confirm Rx Insertable Cardiac Monitor SMART Registry
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenotypic determinants of atrial fibrillation in ischaemic stroke: a retrospective study.Open heart · 2026Article
- Characteristics of patients with cryptogenic stroke and atrial fibrillation detected using insertable cardiac monitoring in the chronic phase: a subanalysis of the LOOK study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- Unveiling the silent enemy: Revisiting post-stroke AF detection.Indian pacing and electrophysiology journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) after a cryptogenic stroke (CS) carries important therapeutic implications. In this study, we aimed to accurately assess the incidence of AF among CS subjects by using an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM).
methodsA prospective, single-arm, multicentre registry was conducted to identify AF in 155 CS subjects using the Confirm Rx ICM (Abbott, California, USA) across 20 global sites. Inclusion criteria comprised participants aged 40 years or older who had experienced CS within a 90-day window. At each follow-up visit, expert electrophysiologists reviewed and adjudicated ICM detected AF episodes. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of true device-detected AF (lasting more than 30 s) at 6 months, evaluated with Kaplan-Meier methods.
resultsAF incidence was 21.3% (95% CI 15.3% to 29.1%) at 6 months, increasing to 48.8% (95% CI 34.7% to 64.9%) at 24 months. Subjects with AF detection experienced an average of 50.9 true AF episodes per subject per year. The median time from implantation to AF detection (>30 s) was 72 days (IQR 7-261). Among subjects with 30 s AF detection, anticoagulation therapy was initiated in 65.2% (30/46) of subjects. Oral anticoagulation medication was prescribed in 8.3% (9/109) of subjects without AF. Recurrent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack occurred in 5 subjects (3.2%, 5/155).
conclusionThese results show that ICM-driven long-term continuous AF monitoring is associated with high diagnostic yield in CS subjects. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03505801.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.