ArticleLupus science & medicine2025
Pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic lupus erythematosus: identification of risk factors and haemodynamics characteristics in a multicentre retrospective cohort.
Article in Lupus science & medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lupus Anticoagulant Testing for Diagnosis of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Perspective Informed by Local Practice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of our work was to identify specific patterns in clinical features and nailfold capillary changes that may help in screening for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
methodsWe identified patients with SLE and type I PAH (n=20) without other connective tissue diseases and collected demographic, clinical and laboratory features. We selected as controls patients with SLE who underwent cardiopulmonary screening to exclude PAH (n=87): we collected demographic, clinical and laboratory features and performed nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC).
resultsAll patients with SLE-PAH were women; age and disease duration were not different from patients with SLE without PAH. Lupus anticoagulant (LAC)+and anti-ribonucleoprotein (RNP)+were more prevalent in patients with SLE-PAH (respectively, PAH 45.0% vs no-PAH 20.5%, p=0.042; PAH 45.0% vs no-PAH 19.5%, p=0.035). No differences were observed for anti-Sm, anti-Ro, anti-La and anti-cardiolipin and anti-beta2GPI antibodies. Among clinical features, mucocutaneous and central nervous system involvement were more prevalent in patients with SLE-PAH than in SLE controls (respectively, PAH 65.0% vs no-PAH 34.5%, p=0.024; PAH 25.0% vs no-PAH 8.0%, p=0.046). Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) was more prevalent in patients with SLE-PAH than in SLE controls (PAH 60.0% vs no-PAH 13.8%, p<0.001). RP was a predictor of PAH in patients with SLE (OR 3.8 (0.9-14.8)). We performed NVC on nine patients with PAH and on controls: we observed a significantly higher prevalence of scleroderma pattern at NVC in SLE-PAH than controls (PAH 66.7% vs no-PAH 9.2%, p<0.001). Patients with SLE-PAH showed a lower number of capillary density and a higher frequency of giant capillaries.
conclusionsOur data showed that LAC+, RNP+, RP and a scleroderma pattern at NVC was indicative for patients with SLE-PAH. Our results pointed to generalised microvascular involvement and a hypercoagulation state in patients with SLE-PAH. The variables we identified could be used to implement a screening algorithm to identify patients with SLE at risk of developing PAH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.