Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40514011›Full record

ArticleTransplantation and cellular therapy2025

Seizure Prophylaxis and its Impact on Busulfan Pharmacokinetics and Dosing in a Novel Timed Sequential Protocol: MD Anderson Experience.

Jitesh D Kawedia, Victoria W Handy, Alan L Myers, Alison M Gulbis, Rohtesh Mehta, Richard E Champlin, Elizabeth J Shpall, Yago Nieto, Borje S Andersson, Uday R Popat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jitesh D KawediaDepartment of Pharmacy Clinical Programs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Victoria W HandyDepartment of Pharmacy Clinical Programs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Alan L MyersDepartment of Pharmacy Clinical Programs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Alison M GulbisDepartment of Pharmacy Clinical Programs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Rohtesh MehtaDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Richard E ChamplinDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Elizabeth J ShpallDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Yago NietoDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Borje S AnderssonDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Uday R PopatDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: Upopat@mdanderson.org.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High dose busulfan (Bu) is widely used in conditioning regimens for patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Like all alkylating agents, it has significant inter-patient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability. The influence of Bu plasma exposure on treatment outcomes and toxicities have led to the continued use of therapeutic drug monitoring of Bu. We investigated Bu PK in a unique myeloablative fractionated Bu regimen, designed to lower nonrelapse mortality in older patients and those with comorbidities. Intravenous (IV) Bu was administered once daily for 6 days, with a 7-day break after the first 2 Bu doses. Since seizures are a major risk of high-dose Bu, phenytoin was given as seizure prophylaxis. In an interim analysis, we noted a substantially increased (14.7%) Bu clearance on day -6 compared with day -13. When phenytoin was replaced by levetiracetam, Bu clearance increased by only 4.9% between days -13 and -6, significantly lower than that observed with phenytoin (P = .00001). These results indicate the presence of a drug-drug interaction (DDI) between Bu and phenytoin. There was no difference in efficacy of seizure prophylaxis between phenytoin and levetiracetam, and there were no experienced adverse events related to levetiracetam. Our results indicate that levetiracetam is a safe and efficacious alternative to phenytoin for seizure prophylaxis in Bu-based conditioning regimens in stem cell transplantation, notably without the significant drug-drug interaction observed with phenytoin.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsBusulfanHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationSeizuresTransplantation ConditioningAdultAgedDrug InteractionsFemaleHumansLevetiracetamMaleMiddle AgedPhenytoinAnticonvulsantsBusulfanLevetiracetamPhenytoinBusulfanConditioningDrug-drug interactionsLevetiracetamPharmacokineticsPhenytoinSeizure prophylaxisStem cell transplant

Identifiers

PMID40514011
PMCPMC13599140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.