ArticleTransplantation and cellular therapy2025
Seizure Prophylaxis and its Impact on Busulfan Pharmacokinetics and Dosing in a Novel Timed Sequential Protocol: MD Anderson Experience.
Article in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Randomized Trial of Two Fractionation Schedules of Myeloablative Busulfan with Fludarabine and Cladribine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndromes.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2026Trial
- From Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Model-Informed Precision Dosing: A Review of Busulfan Dosing Optimization in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High dose busulfan (Bu) is widely used in conditioning regimens for patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Like all alkylating agents, it has significant inter-patient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability. The influence of Bu plasma exposure on treatment outcomes and toxicities have led to the continued use of therapeutic drug monitoring of Bu. We investigated Bu PK in a unique myeloablative fractionated Bu regimen, designed to lower nonrelapse mortality in older patients and those with comorbidities. Intravenous (IV) Bu was administered once daily for 6 days, with a 7-day break after the first 2 Bu doses. Since seizures are a major risk of high-dose Bu, phenytoin was given as seizure prophylaxis. In an interim analysis, we noted a substantially increased (14.7%) Bu clearance on day -6 compared with day -13. When phenytoin was replaced by levetiracetam, Bu clearance increased by only 4.9% between days -13 and -6, significantly lower than that observed with phenytoin (P = .00001). These results indicate the presence of a drug-drug interaction (DDI) between Bu and phenytoin. There was no difference in efficacy of seizure prophylaxis between phenytoin and levetiracetam, and there were no experienced adverse events related to levetiracetam. Our results indicate that levetiracetam is a safe and efficacious alternative to phenytoin for seizure prophylaxis in Bu-based conditioning regimens in stem cell transplantation, notably without the significant drug-drug interaction observed with phenytoin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.