ReviewSurvey of ophthalmology
Brillouin microscopy for focal biomechanical measurements in normal and keratoconic corneas: A narrative review.
Review in Survey of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combination of tissue-derived and shape-based parameters for subclinical keratoconus detection.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Motion-Tracking Brillouin Microscopy for Keratoconus Suspect Identification: Comparison With Multimodal Corneal Imaging.American journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Mechanical Characterization of Normal, Subclinical, and Keratoconic Corneas Using Motion Tracking Brillouin Microscopy.American journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Focal Weakening/Thinnest Corneal Point Proximity in Normal, Subclinical, and Keratoconic Corneas Using Motion-Tracking Brillouin Microscopy.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Corneal mechanical weakness is widely recognized as the root cause of keratoconus and a primary driver for undesirable refractive surgery outcomes. Theory, finite element modeling, and initial data predict that focal rather than generalized weakening precipitates corneal mechanical decompensation. Direct, 3-dimensionally (3-D) localized in vivo corneal mechanical measurements thus have the potential to revolutionize keratoconus management and the surgical correction of myopia. Collagen microarchitecture and mechanical profiles in normal and keratoconic corneas have been evaluated ex vivo, but significant gaps remain in our understanding of the earliest subclinical manifestations that can eventually lead to clinical disease. Nonperturbative Brillouin microscopy has emerged as a novel approach for measuring corneal mechanics by analyzing Brillouin light scattering, which encodes the corneal elastic modulus (longitudinal modulus). Early ex vivo works demonstrated the technique's ability to identify depth-dependent (axial) anisotropy in the normal cornea, focal weakening in the keratoconic cornea, and stiffening after corneal cross-linking. Recent advances using motion-tracking Brillouin imaging, which employs optical coherence tomography and eye tracking to facilitate 3-D signal localization, have provided novel insights into keratoconus at the subclinical stage. Locally reduced Brillouin shift values in the anterior cornea have differentiated subclinical keratoconic cornea from normal controls and outperformed current clinical standard morphologic evaluation using Scheimpflug technology. Herein, we highlight the development of Brillouin microscopy for in vivo corneal analysis, current imaging advances and technological limitations, and future directions for in vivo analysis of subclinical keratoconus to advance our understanding of keratoconus diagnosis, disease evolution, and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.