Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40513225›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2025

Cross-language interaction during sequential anomia treatment in three languages: Evidence from a trilingual person with aphasia.

Claudia Peñaloza, Manuel Jose Marte, Anne Billot, Swathi Kiran

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Claudia PeñalozaDepartment of Cognition, Development and Educational Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Cognition and Brain Plasticity Unit, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: claudia_penaloza@ub.edu.
Manuel Jose MarteCenter for Brain Recovery, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Anne BillotCenter for Brain Recovery, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, USA; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Swathi KiranCenter for Brain Recovery, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Predicting rehabilitation outcomes in bilingual aphasia using computational modelingU01DC014922 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI KIRAN, SWATHI, MIIKKULAINEN, RISTO · 2016 to 2020
$3.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS U01 DC014922
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Language rehabilitation research has reported mixed evidence in bilinguals with aphasia suggesting that therapy can benefit the treated language alone or additionally result in cross-language generalization to the untreated language, while cross-language interference effects are less common. However, treatment effects in multilinguals with aphasia (MWA) have been less frequently investigated, and examining cross-language interactions during therapy may help to better understand their treatment response in each language. This study reports on P1, a trilingual person with severe aphasia with extensive damage to cortical language regions and the basal ganglia, who received sequential semantic-based treatment for anomia in her L3 French, L1 Spanish and L2 English. Overall, significant treatment gains in the treated language were restricted to her L3 French, the weakest language, while her treatment response was limited across languages likely due to severe language impairment and extensive damage to the language processing network. Cross-language generalization effects were absent and P1 showed cross-language interference in her L2 English during treatment in her L3 French. Cross-language intrusions were observed between languages, more frequently in her L2 English (the least available language in treatment) than in her L1 Spanish (the strongest language). The absence of cross-language generalization and presence of cross-language interference in P1 were likely due to damage in the basal ganglia and executive deficits reflecting damage to the language control network. Severe language processing and language control impairments can hinder the balance between activation and inhibition mechanisms necessary to support response to language treatment in MWA.

Indexed as

AnomiaAphasiaLanguage TherapyMultilingualismFemaleHumansLanguageTreatment OutcomeAnomia treatmentBasal gangliaCross-language generalizationCross-language interferenceTrilingual aphasia

Identifiers

PMID40513225
PMCPMC12296292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.