Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40513094›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2025

Use of Online Tools for Mental Health Among Racially and Ethnically Diverse College Students: Mixed Methods Study.

Sarah Z Hamza, Yesenia Aguilar Silvan, Lauren C Ng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah Z HamzaUniversity of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-5754-5961
Yesenia Aguilar SilvanUniversity of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1978-3274
Lauren C NgUniversity of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5988-008X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnxiety and depression symptoms have been rising among college students, with many increasingly meeting the criteria for 1 or more mental health problems. Due to a rise in internet access and lockdown restrictions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, online mediums, such as teletherapy, repositories for mental health information, discussion forums, self-help programs, and online screening tools, have become more popular and used by college students to support their mental health. However, there is limited information about individual-level factors that lead college students to use these online tools to support their mental health.

objectiveThis mixed methods study aimed to examine the associations between demographics, symptom severity, mental health literacy, stigma, attitudes, and self-efficacy and the use of online tools to seek psychological information and services among racially and ethnically diverse college students. This study also aimed to qualitatively characterize types of online tools used, reasons for using tools or lack thereof, and perceived helpfulness of tools.

methodsUndergraduate students (N=123) completed validated measures and provided open-ended descriptions of the types of online tools they used to seek psychological information and services and their reasons for using those tools. Logistic regression analyses were used to test associations of online tool use to seek mental health information and hypothesized predictors. Descriptive statistics were conducted to examine online tool types, reasons for using online tools, and helpfulness explanations.

resultsIn total, 49.6% (61/123) of the participants used online tools (eg, search engines) to seek mental health information, while 30.1% (37/123) used online tools (eg, medical websites) to seek mental health services. Mental health literacy (P=.002; odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 1.05-1.24) was associated with greater use of online tools to seek mental health information. None of the hypothesized variables predicted online tool use to seek mental health services. In total, 82% (50/61) of participants who sought information found online tools somewhat helpful, while 49% (18/37) of participants who sought services found online tools very helpful. Of the students who did not use online tools to seek information, 19% (12/62) reported it was because they did not know which online tools to use and 31% (19/62) stated they would be encouraged to use online tools if it was recommended by professionals, therapists, family, or friends. Of the students who did not use online tools to seek services, 33% (28/86) reported it was because they did not think mental health help was necessary.

conclusionsThese findings highlight the use of online tools to provide mental health information and connect to professional services, suggesting that online tools are widely used to access mental health support.

Indexed as

EthnicityInternetMental HealthStudentsAdolescentAdultDepressionFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansMaleRacial GroupsUniversitiesYoung Adultattitudecollege studentsdiverseexperiencehelp-seeking behaviorliteracymental healthonline informationonline toolperspectivequalitativeself-efficacysurvey

Identifiers

PMID40513094
PMCPMC12205266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.